{"id":4228,"date":"2025-08-07T13:05:51","date_gmt":"2025-08-07T13:05:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/?p=4228"},"modified":"2025-08-07T13:33:44","modified_gmt":"2025-08-07T13:33:44","slug":"pronadeno-veliko-nalaziste-nafte-u-brazilskim-vodama-copy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/2025\/08\/07\/pronadeno-veliko-nalaziste-nafte-u-brazilskim-vodama-copy\/","title":{"rendered":"Op\u0161tina Tuzi nezakonito napla\u0107ivala porez na nekretnine"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"4228\" class=\"elementor elementor-4228\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2a37b54a e-con-full e-flex wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"2a37b54a\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d2c2a63 e-con-full e-flex wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no e-con e-child\" data-id=\"d2c2a63\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-1812683f elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"1812683f\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Rukovodstvo op\u0161tine Tuzi sprovodilo je do sada nezakonitu praksu oporezivanja na dobit, pokazuje primjer kompanije \u201ePlanta\u017ee\u201c.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ova, nekada gradska op\u0161tina u sastavu Podgorice, a danas lokalna samouprava u punom zakonskom kapacitetu mo\u017ee da se na\u0111e u velikom problemu u slu\u010daju da se ne usvoji amandman prilikom ponovnog usvajanja Prijedloga zakona o porezu na nekretnine u Skup\u0161tini Crne Gore. Ako se zakon usvoji bez tog amandmana, Tuzi \u0107e morati da isplate \u010dak \u010detiri miliona eura iz svog lokalnog bud\u017eeta firmama koje su u prijethodnih pet godina preko zakonske mjere oporezivale.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ishod sljede\u0107e parlamentarne sjednice pa\u017eljivo \u0107e osmatrati i rukovodstva ostalih crnogorskih op\u0161tina jer \u0107e, ako se amandman iz Tuza doda zakonskom rje\u0161enju, i u drugim sredinama mo\u0107i privredrnim subjektima na svojoj teritoriji da razrezuju izdatke kolike god \u017eele.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Zakon je ve\u0107 jednom usvojen u parlamentu, ali ga je predsjednik dr\u017eave Jakov Milatovi\u0107 vratio na ponovno razmatranje iskoristiv\u0161i svoje ustavno pravo tzv. \u201esuspenzivnog veta\u201c. Prema Ustavu, ako Skup\u0161tina jo\u0161 jednom usvoji zakonski akt, Milatovi\u0107 \u0107e morati da ga potpi\u0161e poslije \u010dega on stupa na snagu.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Milatovi\u0107 je u obrazlo\u017eenju svoje odluke o vra\u0107anju pomenutog akta poslanicima ocjenio da su rje\u0161enja iz zakona na prvom mjestu neustavna, a zatim i diskriminatorna kao i da uvode nesigurnost me\u0111u crnogorske poljoprivrednike. Prijedlogom nije zadovoljno ni Ministarstvo finansija u \u010dijem se mi\u0161ljenju navodi da \u0107e svojim retroaktivnim mjerama destimulisati proizvo\u0111a\u010de hrane.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Najproblemati\u010dnija odluka koju donosi ovaj prijedlog zakona odnosi se na \u010dinjenicu da \u0107e ubudu\u0107e op\u0161tine biti oslobo\u0111ene obaveze da za 70% umanje stopu poreza na nekretnine koje se koriste u svrhu poljoprivredne proizvodnje. Zauzvrat je data mogu\u0107nost da se poljoprivrednicima za ovu vrstu poreza da popust do 90% iznosa propisane sume. Me\u0111utim, ovo je samo mogu\u0107nost, a ne i zakonska obaveza.<\/p><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Iz kompanije \u201ePlanta\u017ee\u201c tvrde da se zakon mijenja samo da bi \u010delnici op\u0161tine Tuze nastavili da im proizvoljno razrezuju porez bez ikakvih posljedica. Rukovodstvo ovog preduze\u0107a podsje\u0107a da je op\u0161tina ve\u0107 izgubila tri spora pred Upravnim sudom i da je u svim presudama ustanovljeno da su stope odre\u0111ivane nezakonito.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-df7e021 e-con-full e-flex wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no e-con e-child\" data-id=\"df7e021\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c3a1298 elementor-widget elementor-widget-wpr-post-title\" data-id=\"c3a1298\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"wpr-post-title.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"wpr-post-title\">Op\u0161tina Tuzi nezakonito napla\u0107ivala porez na nekretnine<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-6e473ff elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-breadcrumbs\" data-id=\"6e473ff\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-breadcrumbs.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"eael-breadcrumbs\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"eael-breadcrumbs__content\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\">Home<\/a> <span class=\"eael-breadcrumb-separator\">\/<\/span> <\/div>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-cc13a3d elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"cc13a3d\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-14f10a2 e-flex e-con-boxed wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"14f10a2\" data-element_type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rukovodstvo op\u0161tine Tuzi sprovodilo je do sada nezakonitu praksu oporezivanja na dobit, pokazuje primjer kompanije \u201ePlanta\u017ee\u201c. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ova, nekada gradska op\u0161tina u sastavu Podgorice, a danas lokalna samouprava u punom zakonskom kapacitetu mo\u017ee da se na\u0111e u velikom problemu u slu\u010daju da se ne usvoji amandman prilikom ponovnog usvajanja Prijedloga zakona o porezu na nekretnine u Skup\u0161tini Crne Gore. Ako se zakon usvoji bez tog amandmana, Tuzi \u0107e morati da isplate \u010dak \u010detiri miliona eura iz svog lokalnog bud\u017eeta firmama koje su u prijethodnih pet godina preko zakonske mjere oporezivale. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ishod sljede\u0107e parlamentarne sjednice pa\u017eljivo \u0107e osmatrati i rukovodstva ostalih crnogorskih op\u0161tina jer \u0107e, ako se amandman iz Tuza doda zakonskom rje\u0161enju, i u drugim sredinama mo\u0107i privredrnim subjektima na svojoj teritoriji da razrezuju izdatke kolike god \u017eele. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Zakon je ve\u0107 jednom usvojen u parlamentu, ali ga je predsjednik dr\u017eave Jakov Milatovi\u0107 vratio na ponovno razmatranje iskoristiv\u0161i svoje ustavno pravo tzv. \u201esuspenzivnog veta\u201c. Prema Ustavu, ako Skup\u0161tina jo\u0161 jednom usvoji zakonski akt, Milatovi\u0107 \u0107e morati da ga potpi\u0161e poslije \u010dega on stupa na snagu. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Milatovi\u0107 je u obrazlo\u017eenju svoje odluke o vra\u0107anju pomenutog akta poslanicima ocjenio da su rje\u0161enja iz zakona na prvom mjestu neustavna, a zatim i diskriminatorna kao i da uvode nesigurnost me\u0111u crnogorske poljoprivrednike. Prijedlogom nije zadovoljno ni Ministarstvo finansija u \u010dijem se mi\u0161ljenju navodi da \u0107e svojim retroaktivnim mjerama destimulisati proizvo\u0111a\u010de hrane. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Najproblemati\u010dnija odluka koju donosi ovaj prijedlog zakona odnosi se na \u010dinjenicu da \u0107e ubudu\u0107e op\u0161tine biti oslobo\u0111ene obaveze da za 70% umanje stopu poreza na nekretnine koje se koriste u svrhu poljoprivredne proizvodnje. Zauzvrat je data mogu\u0107nost da se poljoprivrednicima za ovu vrstu poreza da popust do 90% iznosa propisane sume. Me\u0111utim, ovo je samo mogu\u0107nost, a ne i zakonska obaveza. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Iz kompanije \u201ePlanta\u017ee\u201c tvrde da se zakon mijenja samo da bi \u010delnici op\u0161tine Tuze nastavili da im proizvoljno razrezuju porez bez ikakvih posljedica. Rukovodstvo ovog preduze\u0107a podsje\u0107a da je op\u0161tina ve\u0107 izgubila tri spora pred Upravnim sudom i da je u svim presudama ustanovljeno da su stope odre\u0111ivane nezakonito. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Prona\u0111eno veliko nalazi\u0161te nafte u brazilskim vodama &#8211; Copy Home \/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4229,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomija"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4228"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4233,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4228\/revisions\/4233"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ekonomist.me\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}